Opinion | The US and China hold the key to each other’s economic puzzle

Name: ‘Fake news’: Chinese officials dismiss claims of US trade war consultations
Uploaded: 2025-05-11T12:30:08.000Z
Duration: 1 min 38 s
Description: ‘Fake news’: Chinese officials dismiss claims of US trade war consultations

One consumes too much, produces too little. The other produces too much, consumes too little. What if each could solve the other’s problem?

Reading Time:3 minutes

Why you can trust SCMP

People look at the Iphone 16 at an Apple store in Shanghai on April 11, 2025. US President Donald Trump abruptly paused tariffs on most countries, sparking euphoria on global markets on April 10, but upped the ante on a brutal trade war with superpower rival China. Photo: AFP

Anthony W.D. Anastasi

Published: 8:30pm, 11 May 2025Updated: 9:34pm, 11 May 2025

As an American economics professor in China, I often tell my students that the problems facing the US and Chinese economies are like puzzle pieces, but opposite in shape.

The United States has suffered a hollowing out of manufacturing and persistent trade deficits and it is too reliant on consumer spending and imported goods. China, in contrast, has an overbuilt industrial base and excess savings and is driven by exports and investment rather than household consumption.

One country consumes too much and produces too little. The other produces too much and consumes too little. What if each holds the key to the other’s puzzle? Indeed, the economics of the solution to each country’s problem seems to make perfect sense; it is just that the politics of cooperation is most likely to prevent it.

Both countries are targeting core economic weaknesses: the US wants more production at home and China wants more spending by households. Washington has launched sweeping tariffs to reshore manufacturing while Beijing has made consumption a top priority. It is unclear whether either can succeed alone. What if their efforts were aligned?

Could rising Chinese demand support US exports, and could an American supply-side revival help meet that demand? Might such coordination ease the disruptive effect of these shifts, especially for countries caught between a shrinking US trade deficit and Chinese manufacturers with shrinking subsidies?

01:38

‘Fake news’: Chinese officials dismiss claims of US trade war consultations

Trade balances and manufacturing are usually lumped together when discussing global imbalances, as manufacturing is the most tradeable sector. It’s worth remembering that a trade balance is just an accounting identity: it reflects the gap between domestic demand (consumption + investment) and domestic production (consumption + savings).